The motivation behind creating the V-Model was to connect both requirement decomposition and system specifications to validation and verification. (Actually, V&V stands for verification and validation). OSC2.0's automation and measurement capabilities enhance the workflow for improved productivity while reducing room for errors, and facilitating communication across development and V&V teams. But how do you effectively apply the OSC2.0 and Coverage Driven Verification (CDV) concepts to requirements-based testing?
Sharon Rosenberg
Solution architect and chief methodologist
Users Frequently Ask:
How should I extract the V&V objectives from the provided requirements
How do I efficiently achieve, measure, and communicate requirement completion?
How do I trace and present information such as relevant scenarios, coverage goals, KPIs, and checks in the requirement measurement system?
How do randomness and reusable V&V packages help identify missing requirements or refine the existing ones?
How do Pegasus's six layers assist the automated requirement-based flow?